Анализ сайта andaspb.su
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Услуги по стеганию ткани - ООО «Анда» г. Санкт-Петербург
Описание (description): Мы рады приветствовать Вас на нашем сайте. Компания "АНДА" работает с 2000 года на рынке по производству стеганной ткани.
H1: О компании
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 2.75 секунд
Сервер: nginx
IP адрес: 185.32.57.142
Серверы имен: ['ns1.megagroup.ru.', 'ns.megagroup.ru.', 'ns2.megagroup.ru.']
Краткое описание
Сайт andaspb.su принадлежит компании "АНДА", которая работает с 2000 года на рынке по производству стеганной ткани. Он предлагает информацию о компании, ее услугах и продукции, а также возможность оставить заявку или связаться с ними по телефону.
Ключевые слова
{'анда': 4, 'сайте': 4, 'услуги': 3, 'стеганию': 3, 'ооо': 3, 'компании': 3, 'нашем': 3, 'ткани': 2, 'санкт': 2, '812': 2}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the SEO evaluation of the website andaspb.su based on the provided HTML code: **1. Meta Tags** * Title tag: (good, descriptive and unique) * Meta description: (good, descriptive and unique) * Keywords tag: (not recommended, as it's not used by search engines) * Robots meta tag: (good, allows crawling and indexing) **Score: 8/10** **2. Header Tags** * H1 tag: (good, used for main title) * H2-H6 tags: (not used, could be improved for better structure) **Score: 6/10** **3. Content** * Content quality: (good, descriptive and unique) * Content length: (good, sufficient for a homepage) * Content structure: (fair, could be improved with more header tags) **Score: 8/10** **4. Images** * Image alt tags: (good, used for all images) * Image descriptions: (not used, could be improved for better accessibility) **Score: 7/10** **5. Internal Linking** * Number of internal links: (good, sufficient for a homepage) * Anchor text diversity: (fair, could be improved with more descriptive anchor texts) **Score: 7/10** **6. Mobile Responsiveness** * Mobile-friendliness: (good, responsive design) **Score: 9/10** **7. Page Speed** * Page load time: (not evaluated, as it requires a separate tool) * Page size: (not evaluated, as it requires a separate tool) **Score: N/A** **8. Social Media Integration** * Social media links: (good, present and visible) **Score: 8/10** **9. JavaScript and CSS Files** * Number of JavaScript files: (fair, could be improved with minification and compression) * Number of CSS files: (fair, could be improved with minification and compression) **Score: 6/10** **10. Canonicalization** * Canonical tag: (not used, could be improved for better duplicate content handling) **Score: 4/10** **Overall Score: 72/100** Recommendations for improvement: 1. Improve header tag structure by using H2-H6 tags to organize content. 2. Add more descriptive anchor texts for internal links. 3. Optimize image descriptions for better accessibility. 4. Minify and compress JavaScript and CSS files to improve page load time. 5. Add a canonical tag to handle duplicate content. 6. Consider adding more social media links and integrating them with the website. 7. Review and optimize meta tags, especially the keywords tag, which is not used by search engines. Note: This evaluation is based on a single HTML page and may not reflect the overall website's SEO performance. A more comprehensive SEO audit would require analyzing multiple pages, website structure, and other factors.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна