Анализ сайта filtrum-safari.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Фильтрум-Сафари Фильтрум-СТ: инструкц по применению, описание, Фильтрум дл дете пр отравлении. Наличи аптека
Описание (description):
H1: Фильтрум-Сафари – первый вкусныйэнтеросорбент для лечения рвоты и диареи у детей
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 4.12 секунд
Сервер: nginx-reuseport/1.21.1
IP адрес: 5.101.152.7
Серверы имен: ['ns2.beget.ru.', 'ns1.beget.ru.', 'ns2.beget.pro.', 'ns1.beget.pro.', 'ns2.beget.com.', 'ns1.beget.com.']
Краткое описание
Сайт filtrum-safari.ru посвящен препарату Фильтрум-Сафари, который является вкусным энтеросорбентом для лечения рвоты и диареи у детей. Сайт содержит информацию о препарате, его использовании, преимуществах и возможностях профилактического применения. Кроме того, на сайте есть разделы с новостями, статьями и информацией о том, как купить препарат.
Ключевые слова
{'фильтрум': 8, 'сафари': 6, 'наличи': 4, 'отравлен': 4, 'желудочн': 3, 'кишечног': 3, 'тракта': 3, 'кишечной': 3, 'avva': 3, 'rus': 3}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the evaluation of the website filtrum-safari.ru from an SEO perspective, based on the provided HTML code: **1. Title Tag**: 6/10 The title tag is present, but it's quite long and doesn't seem to be optimized for search engines. It's also not descriptive and doesn't include the brand name. **2. Meta Description**: 0/10 The meta description is empty, which means that search engines will generate their own description for the page, which may not be accurate or appealing to users. **3. Keyword Tag**: 0/10 The keyword tag is empty, which is not a problem since it's not a relevant ranking factor anymore. However, it's still a good practice to include relevant keywords to help search engines understand the content of the page. **4. Header Tags**: 8/10 The page uses header tags (H1, H2) to structure the content, which is good for accessibility and SEO. However, there's only one H1 tag, and it's not descriptive. **5. Content Quality**: 7/10 The content seems to be well-written and informative, but it's not optimized for search engines. There are no subheadings, and the text is not broken up into smaller paragraphs. **6. Image Optimization**: 4/10 Images are not optimized for search engines, as they don't have descriptive alt tags or file names. **7. Internal Linking**: 5/10 There are some internal links, but they're not descriptive, and there's no clear hierarchy of pages. **8. Mobile-Friendliness**: 8/10 The page seems to be mobile-friendly, as it uses a responsive design. **9. Page Speed**: 6/10 The page speed is average, but it could be improved by optimizing images and reducing the number of HTTP requests. **10. Analytics and Tracking**: 8/10 The page has Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika tracking codes, which is good for tracking user behavior and website performance. Recommendations for improvement: 1. Optimize the title tag to include the brand name and a descriptive phrase. 2. Write a compelling and descriptive meta description to entice users to click on the page. 3. Use header tags to structure the content and highlight important keywords. 4. Optimize images by adding descriptive alt tags and file names. 5. Improve internal linking by using descriptive anchor text and creating a clear hierarchy of pages. 6. Optimize the content by breaking it up into smaller paragraphs and using subheadings. 7. Improve page speed by optimizing images and reducing the number of HTTP requests. Overall, the website has some good practices in place, but there's room for improvement in terms of SEO optimization.