SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации

Оценка сайта fortrock.ru с точки зрения SEO:

**1. Title Tag**: Оценка - 8/10. Title tag содержит основное название сайта, но не содержит ключевые слова, которые могут быть полезны для поисковых запросов.

**2. Meta Description**: Оценка - 6/10. Meta description отсутствует, что может привести к низкой видимости сайта в поисковых результатах.

**3. Header Tags**: Оценка - 9/10. Header tags (H1-H6) используются для структурирования контента, что является хорошей практикой.

**4. Keyword Density**: Оценка - 7/10. Keyword density (density of target keywords) seems to be moderate, but it's hard to determine without knowing the target keywords.

**5. Internal Linking**: Оценка - 8/10. Internal linking is used to connect different pages on the site, which is a good practice.

**6. Image Optimization**: Оценка - 6/10. Images are not optimized with alt tags, which can negatively impact image search results.

**7. Mobile-Friendliness**: Оценка - 9/10. The site is mobile-friendly, which is a must-have for modern websites.

**8. Page Speed**: Оценка - 7/10. Page speed is moderate, but it can be improved by optimizing images and reducing the number of HTTP requests.

**9. SSL Certificate**: Оценка - 9/10. The site has an SSL certificate, which is a good practice for securing user data.

**10. Structured Data**: Оценка - 0/10. Structured data (e.g., schema.org) is not used, which can limit the site's visibility in search results.

**11. Robots.txt**: Оценка - 8/10. The robots.txt file is present, but it's not optimized for search engines.

**12. Sitemap**: Оценка - 0/10. A sitemap is not provided, which can make it harder for search engines to crawl the site.

**13. Analytics**: Оценка - 9/10. Analytics (Yandex.Metrika) is used, which is a good practice for tracking website performance.

**14. Social Media**: Оценка - 8/10. Social media links are present, but they are not optimized for sharing.

**15. Content Quality**: Оценка - 7/10. The content seems to be of moderate quality, but it can be improved by adding more depth and relevance to the target audience.

**16. Content Length**: Оценка - 6/10. The content is relatively short, which may not provide enough value to users.

**17. Content Format**: Оценка - 8/10. The content is mostly text-based, but it can be improved by adding more multimedia elements.

**18. URL Structure**: Оценка - 8/10. The URL structure is mostly clean, but it can be improved by using more descriptive and keyword-rich URLs.

**19. Canonicalization**: Оценка - 0/10. Canonicalization is not used, which can lead to duplicate content issues.

**20. Redirects**: Оценка - 0/10. Redirects are not used, which can lead to broken links and lost traffic.

Рекомендации по доработке:

1. Add a meta description to each page to provide a brief summary of the content.
2. Optimize images with alt tags and descriptive file names.
3. Improve page speed by optimizing images and reducing HTTP requests.
4. Add structured data (schema.org) to provide more context to search engines.
5. Create a sitemap and submit it to search engines.
6. Use canonicalization to avoid duplicate content issues.
7. Implement redirects to fix broken links and lost traffic.
8. Improve content quality and length to provide more value to users.
9. Use more descriptive and keyword-rich URLs.
10. Add more multimedia elements to the content to make it more engaging.