Анализ сайта graintruck.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Перевозка сельхоз продукции автотранспортом в ЦФО, ЮФО, ПФО и новых регионах
Описание (description): Description site
H1: Перевозка сельхоз продукции автотранспортом в ЦФО, ЮФО, ПФО и новых регионах Москва ➡️ Таганрог
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 3.85 секунд
Сервер: nginx
IP адрес: 37.140.192.170
Серверы имен: ['ns1.hosting.reg.ru.', 'ns2.hosting.reg.ru.']
Краткое описание
Сайт graintruck.ru - это официальный ресурс компании МФЦ Премиум, которая специализируется на перевозке сельскохозяйственной продукции автотранспортом в Центральном, Южном и Приволжском федеральных округах, а также в новых регионах. Компания предлагает услуги по организации перевозок под ключ, анализируя доступный транспорт, выбирая лучшую цену и обеспечивая безопасность груза.
Ключевые слова
{'цфо': 3, 'юфо': 3, 'пфо': 3, 'перевозка': 2, 'сельхоз': 2, 'продукции': 2, 'автотранспортом': 2, 'новых': 2, 'регионах': 2, 'условия': 2}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the SEO evaluation of the website graintruck.ru based on the provided HTML code: **1. Meta Tags and Titles** * Title tag: 8/10 (unique and descriptive, but could be shorter and more concise) * Meta description: 6/10 (present, but too short and generic) * Meta keywords: N/A (not present, which is okay since they're not used by search engines anymore) * Other meta tags (og, twitter, etc.): 8/10 (present and correctly formatted) **2. Header Tags** * H1 tag: 8/10 (present and descriptive, but could be more concise) * H2-H6 tags: N/A (not present, but not necessary in this case) * Header tag structure: 7/10 (could be improved for better hierarchy and structure) **3. Content** * Content quality: N/A (cannot be evaluated based on HTML code alone) * Content length: N/A (cannot be evaluated based on HTML code alone) * Content structure: 7/10 (could be improved for better readability and hierarchy) **4. Images** * Image optimization: 5/10 (some images have alt tags, but could be improved with descriptive text and compression) * Image file names: 5/10 (could be more descriptive and SEO-friendly) **5. Internal Linking** * Internal linking: 6/10 (some links present, but could be improved with more descriptive anchor text and structure) **6. Mobile-Friendliness** * Mobile-friendliness: 8/10 (responsive design present, but could be improved with more mobile-specific optimizations) **7. Page Speed** * Page speed: N/A (cannot be evaluated based on HTML code alone, but could be improved with optimization techniques) **8. Social Media Integration** * Social media integration: 5/10 (some social media tags present, but could be improved with more comprehensive integration) **9. JavaScript and CSS** * JavaScript and CSS optimization: 5/10 (some scripts and styles present, but could be improved with minification, compression, and caching) **10. Analytics and Tracking** * Analytics and tracking: 8/10 (Yandex.Metrika counter present, but could be improved with more comprehensive tracking and analytics setup) Overall score: 6.5/10 Recommendations for improvement: 1. Optimize title tags and meta descriptions for each page to make them more concise, descriptive, and unique. 2. Improve header tag structure and hierarchy for better content organization and readability. 3. Optimize images by adding descriptive alt tags, compressing images, and using SEO-friendly file names. 4. Improve internal linking with more descriptive anchor text and structure. 5. Optimize page speed by minifying and compressing scripts and styles, and leveraging browser caching. 6. Improve social media integration by adding more comprehensive social media tags and sharing options. 7. Consider adding more comprehensive tracking and analytics setup to gain more insights into user behavior and website performance. Note that this evaluation is based on a limited scope of the HTML code and may not reflect the overall website's SEO performance. A more comprehensive SEO audit would require access to the website's backend, analytics data, and other technical aspects.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна