Анализ сайта indeart.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Архитектурная мастерская InDeArt. Частный интерьер во всём своём многообразии | Архитектурное бюро InDeArt
Описание (description): Архитектурная мастерская. Частный интерьер во всём своём многообразии, 8 [926] 24-69-1-69, info@indeart.ru.
H1:
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 4.39 секунд
Сервер: nginx
IP адрес: 31.31.198.234
Серверы имен: ['ns1.hosting.reg.ru.', 'ns2.hosting.reg.ru.']
Краткое описание
Сайт indeart.ru является интернет-ресурсом архитектурной мастерской InDeArt. Здесь представлены работы по дизайну интерьеров, включая апартаменты и квартиры разного размера и стиля. Сайт позволяет узнать больше о компании, просмотреть портфолио, узнать о команде и связаться с ними. Веб-страница также включает в себя слайд-шоу с изображениями интерьеров, а также имеет мобильное меню для удобного просмотра на мобильных устройствах.
Ключевые слова
{'квартира': 16, 'апартаменты': 8, 'neva': 6, 'towers': 6, '2022': 6, 'аэробус': 6, '2012': 5, 'улице': 5, 'столетова': 5, '2017': 5}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the evaluation of the website indeart.ru from an SEO perspective, based on the provided HTML code: **1. Page Title**: 8/10 The page title is present and descriptive, but it's a bit long and could be improved for better search engine ranking. **2. Meta Description**: 9/10 The meta description is present and provides a good summary of the page's content. However, it's a bit long and could be improved for better search engine ranking. **3. Header Tags**: 7/10 Header tags (H1-H6) are not used consistently throughout the page. There is only one H1 tag, and no other header tags are used. **4. Keyword Usage**: 5/10 The keyword "Архитектурная мастерская" is used in the page title, meta description, and meta keywords, but it's not used consistently throughout the page's content. **5. Meta Keywords**: 4/10 The meta keywords tag is empty, which is not recommended. It's better to use relevant and descriptive keywords to help search engines understand the page's content. **6. Image Optimization**: 6/10 Images are used on the page, but they don't have descriptive alt tags or titles. This makes it difficult for search engines to understand the content of the images. **7. Internal Linking**: 8/10 The page has a good internal linking structure, with links to other pages on the website. **8. Mobile-Friendliness**: 9/10 The page is mobile-friendly, with a responsive design that adapts to different screen sizes. **9. Page Speed**: N/A (cannot be evaluated based on the provided HTML code) **10. Social Media Integration**: 8/10 The page has social media integration, with links to social media profiles and sharing buttons. **11. Structured Data**: 9/10 The page uses structured data (Open Graph and Twitter Cards) to provide additional information about the page's content to search engines and social media platforms. **12. Canonicalization**: 8/10 The page has a canonical URL specified, which helps to prevent duplicate content issues. **Recommendations for improvement:** 1. Improve the page title and meta description to make them more concise and descriptive. 2. Use header tags (H1-H6) consistently throughout the page to structure the content. 3. Use descriptive and relevant keywords throughout the page's content. 4. Add descriptive alt tags and titles to images to improve image optimization. 5. Consider adding more internal links to other relevant pages on the website. 6. Test the page speed and optimize it for better performance. 7. Consider adding more structured data (e.g. schema.org) to provide additional information about the page's content to search engines.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна