Анализ сайта olegsoft.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Частный IT специалист. Разработка программного обеспечения. Частный вебмастер. Ит аутсорсинг - OlegSoft
Описание (description): Разработка веб сайтов, Разработка программного обеспечения, обслуживание атс и voip серверов, настройка asterisk, настройка apache, LDAP. Частный ИТ Специалист - OlegSoft
H1: Обо мне: Частный IT специалист
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 1.54 секунд
Сервер: Apache/2.2.22 (Debian)
IP адрес: 178.18.208.101
Серверы имен: ['ns2.nameself.com.', 'ns1.nameself.com.']
Краткое описание
Сайт olegsoft.ru принадлежит частному IT-специалисту Олегу Пустовалову. Здесь предоставлены услуги по разработке веб-сайтов, программного обеспечения, обслуживанию серверов и сетевого оборудования. Кроме того, на сайте есть разделы с информацией о частном вебмастере, портфолио и контактной информации.
Ключевые слова
{'серверов': 9, 'разработка': 8, 'частный': 5, 'программного': 5, 'сайтов': 5, 'портфолио': 5, 'home': 5, 'вернуться': 5, 'далее': 5, 'специалист': 4}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the evaluation of the website olegsoft.ru from an SEO perspective, based on the provided HTML code: **1. Page Title**: 8/10 The page title is descriptive and includes the main keywords, but it's a bit long and could be more concise. **2. Meta Description**: 7/10 The meta description is present, but it's a bit short and doesn't fully summarize the content of the page. **3. Keyword Tags**: 5/10 The keyword tags are present, but they are not very specific and don't cover all the relevant keywords. **4. Header Tags**: 8/10 The header tags (H1, H2, etc.) are used correctly to structure the content, but some of them could be more descriptive. **5. Content Quality**: 7/10 The content is informative, but it's not very engaging and lacks a clear call-to-action. **6. Image Optimization**: 5/10 Some images have alt tags, but they are not very descriptive, and some images are missing alt tags altogether. **7. Internal Linking**: 6/10 The internal linking is present, but it's not very structured, and some links could be more descriptive. **8. Mobile-Friendliness**: 8/10 The website is mobile-friendly, but some elements could be improved for better user experience. **9. Page Speed**: 6/10 The page speed is average, but some optimization could be done to improve the loading time. **10. Social Media Integration**: 4/10 The social media links are present, but they are not very prominent, and some social media platforms are missing. **Recommendations:** 1. Optimize the page title and meta description to be more concise and descriptive. 2. Use more specific and relevant keywords in the keyword tags. 3. Improve the content quality by making it more engaging and adding a clear call-to-action. 4. Optimize images by adding more descriptive alt tags and compressing images to reduce file size. 5. Improve internal linking by making it more structured and using more descriptive anchor text. 6. Optimize the website for better mobile-friendliness and page speed. 7. Make social media integration more prominent and add more social media platforms. Overall, the website has a good foundation, but some optimization is needed to improve its SEO performance.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна