Анализ сайта opentalk2021.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Open Talk 2021 «Цифровые финансовые активы»
Описание (description): Банк ВТБ совместно с Ассоциацией корпоративных казначеев проводят Open Talk «Цифровые финансовые активы», который пройдет в онлайн формате
H1: Open Talk «Цифровые финансовые активы»
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 5.49 секунд
Сервер: Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS) PHP/8.0.29
IP адрес: 217.107.34.211
Серверы имен: ['ns2.jino.ru.', 'ns1.jino.ru.', 'ns4.jino.ru.', 'ns3.jino.ru.']
Краткое описание
Сайт opentalk2021.ru является платформой для проведения общественной дискуссии под названием "Open Talk 2021: Цифровые финансовые активы", организованной Банком ВТБ и Ассоциацией корпоративных казначеев. Сайт позволяет узнать больше о мероприятии, включает информацию о дате и времени начала, а также предоставляет ссылки на другие ресурсы, связанные с цифровыми финансовыми активами.
Ключевые слова
{'open': 3, 'talk': 3, 'цифровые': 3, 'финансовые': 3, 'активы': 3, '2021': 2, 'общественная': 2, 'дискуссия': 2, 'начала': 1, 'мероприятия': 1}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Sure, I'd be happy to evaluate the SEO of the page <https://opentalk2021.ru/> based on the provided HTML code. Here are my evaluations and recommendations for improvement: 1. **Meta tags**: The page has appropriate meta tags, including title, description, and author. The title tag is well-written and includes the target keywords. The description tag is also well-written and includes a brief summary of the page's content. However, the author tag is not a ranking factor and can be removed. Score: 9/10. Recommendation: None. 2. **Headings**: The page has appropriate headings, including H1, H2, and H3. The H1 tag includes the target keywords and accurately describes the page's content. However, there are no H2 tags, which could be used to break up the content into smaller, more digestible sections. Score: 8/10. Recommendation: Add H2 tags to break up the content into smaller sections. 3. **Images**: The page has appropriate alt tags for images, which is good for accessibility and SEO. However, some of the alt tags are not descriptive enough and could be improved. Score: 7/10. Recommendation: Improve the alt tags for images to make them more descriptive. 4. **Links**: The page has both internal and external links, which is good for SEO. However, there are no anchor texts for the links, which could be improved. Score: 6/10. Recommendation: Add anchor texts to the links to make them more descriptive. 5. **Mobile optimization**: The page is optimized for mobile devices, which is good for SEO. The viewport meta tag is set to "width=device-width, initial-scale=1, maximum-scale=1", which is the recommended setting for mobile optimization. Score: 10/10. Recommendation: None. 6. **Structured data**: The page does not have any structured data, such as schema markup, which could be used to provide additional information to search engines. Score: 5/10. Recommendation: Add structured data to provide additional information to search engines. 7. **Page speed**: The page has a fast loading time, which is good for SEO. The HTML code is well-optimized and there are no unnecessary elements that could slow down the page. Score: 9/10. Recommendation: None. Overall, the page has good SEO, but there are some areas for improvement. Here are my recommendations for overall optimization: * Add H2 tags to break up the content into smaller sections. * Improve the alt tags for images to make them more descriptive. * Add anchor texts to the links to make them more descriptive. * Add structured data to provide additional information to search engines. By implementing these recommendations, the page can improve its SEO and increase its visibility in search engine results.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна