Анализ сайта repalab.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Программа полуавтоматической разметки изображений КТ легких
Описание (description):
H1: Программа полуавтоматической разметки изображений КТ легких
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 1.45 секунд
Сервер: nginx-reuseport/1.21.1
IP адрес: 45.130.41.96
Серверы имен: ['ns2.beget.com.', 'ns1.beget.com.', 'ns2.beget.ru.', 'ns1.beget.ru.', 'ns2.beget.pro.', 'ns1.beget.pro.']
Краткое описание
Сайт repalab.ru - это официальный сайт ООО «Репалаб», компании, занимающейся разработкой программного обеспечения для автоматической разметки медицинских изображений, в частности, компьютерной томографии (КТ) легких. Сайт содержит информацию о компании, ее продуктах и услугах, а также иллюстрации примеров работы программы.
Ключевые слова
{'изображения': 10, 'изображений': 7, 'легких': 7, 'яркостей': 7, 'разметки': 6, 'пикселей': 6, 'программа': 4, 'репалаб': 4, 'позволяет': 4, 'математического': 4}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the evaluation of the website repalab.ru from an SEO perspective based on the provided HTML code: **1. Page Title**: 8/10 The page title is present and descriptive, but it's not very concise and doesn't include the main keyword. **2. Meta Description**: 0/10 The meta description is missing, which is a crucial element for search engine results pages (SERPs). **3. Header Tags**: 7/10 Header tags (H1-H3) are used, but there is only one H1 tag, and it's not very descriptive. **4. Content Quality and Uniqueness**: 8/10 The content is unique and provides valuable information, but it's not very engaging, and there are no subheadings or bullet points to improve readability. **5. Keyword Density**: 5/10 The keyword "Программа полуавтоматической разметки изображений КТ легких" is mentioned several times, but it's not optimized for search engines. **6. Image Optimization**: 4/10 Images are used, but they don't have descriptive alt tags, and the file names are not optimized for search engines. **7. Internal Linking**: 6/10 There are some internal links, but they are not descriptive, and there is no clear hierarchy of pages. **8. Mobile-Friendliness**: 9/10 The website is responsive and adapts to different screen sizes, which is essential for modern web development. **9. Page Speed**: 7/10 The page speed is average, but there are some opportunities for improvement, such as compressing images and minifying CSS and JavaScript files. **10. Social Media Integration**: 2/10 There are no social media links or integration, which can help increase engagement and drive traffic to the website. **Recommendations:** 1. **Add a meta description**: Write a concise and descriptive meta description that includes the main keyword. 2. **Optimize header tags**: Use more descriptive header tags, including H2-H3, to improve content structure and readability. 3. **Improve content quality and uniqueness**: Make the content more engaging, and use subheadings, bullet points, and short paragraphs to improve readability. 4. **Optimize images**: Add descriptive alt tags and optimize file names for search engines. 5. **Improve internal linking**: Use descriptive anchor text and create a clear hierarchy of pages to improve user experience and search engine crawling. 6. **Add social media integration**: Add social media links and consider integrating social media sharing buttons to increase engagement and drive traffic to the website. 7. **Improve page speed**: Compress images, minify CSS and JavaScript files, and optimize server response time to improve page speed. By addressing these recommendations, the website can improve its SEO performance and provide a better user experience.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна