Анализ сайта rezkavmoskve.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): Резка керамическои плитки
Описание (description): РЕЗКА ПЛИТКИ. керамогранита и керамики. Оптовым клиентам большие скидки! Узнайте подробности по телефону +7(969) 077-55-55. - У вас большой объем и нужно успеть в сроки…
H1: +7 (995) 901-06-34
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 2.48 секунд
Сервер: nginx-reuseport/1.21.1
IP адрес: 45.130.41.121
Серверы имен: ['ns1.beget.pro.', 'ns2.beget.com.', 'ns1.beget.com.', 'ns2.beget.ru.', 'ns1.beget.ru.', 'ns2.beget.pro.']
Краткое описание
Сайт rezkavmoskve.ru предлагает услуги по резке керамической плитки, керамогранита и гранита в Москве. Они имеют несколько мастерских в разных частях города и могут обеспечивать высококачественные услуги по разным видам резки, включая прямой рез, резку под углом 45 градусов, изготовление плинтусов, подоконников, ступеней и столешниц. Кроме того, они предлагают доставку по Москве и Московской области. Сайт также включает информацию о преимуществах работы с компанией, таких как современный профессиональный электрический плиткорез с водяным охлаждением, и контактные данные для связи.
Ключевые слова
{'резка': 12, 'цена': 11, 'изготовление': 7, 'плитки': 5, 'москве': 4, 'услуги': 3, 'керамогранита': 3, 'керамической': 3, 'мкад': 3, 'наши': 2}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the evaluation of the website rezkavmoskve.ru from an SEO perspective, based on the provided HTML code: **1. Meta Tags** * Title tag: 8/10 (unique and descriptive, but could be more concise) * Meta description: 7/10 (present, but could be more compelling and include target keywords) * Keyword tags: N/A (not present, but not necessary in modern SEO) **2. Header Tags** * H1-H6 tags: 8/10 (present and structured, but could be more descriptive and include target keywords) **3. Content** * Quality and uniqueness: 6/10 (content is present, but could be more engaging and informative) * Keyword usage: 5/10 (keywords are present, but could be more strategically used and optimized) * Content length: 7/10 (content is relatively short, but could be more comprehensive) **4. Image Optimization** * Alt tags: 8/10 (present, but could be more descriptive and include target keywords) * Image file names: 5/10 (not optimized, could be more descriptive and include target keywords) **5. Internal Linking** * Presence of internal links: 8/10 (present, but could be more strategic and include anchor text optimization) **6. Mobile-Friendliness** * Responsive design: 9/10 (present, but could be more optimized for mobile devices) **7. Page Speed** * Page load time: N/A (cannot be evaluated based on HTML code alone) **8. Social Media Integration** * Presence of social media links: 5/10 (not present, could be added to improve engagement and sharing) **9. Analytics and Tracking** * Presence of analytics tools: 9/10 (Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika are present) **10. Technical SEO** * Presence of favicon: 8/10 (present, but could be more optimized) * Presence of canonical URLs: N/A (cannot be evaluated based on HTML code alone) * Presence of SSL certificate: N/A (cannot be evaluated based on HTML code alone) **Recommendations for improvement:** 1. Optimize meta tags, especially the meta description, to make it more compelling and include target keywords. 2. Improve header tags to make them more descriptive and include target keywords. 3. Enhance content quality and uniqueness, and strategically use target keywords. 4. Optimize image file names and alt tags to include target keywords. 5. Improve internal linking by using anchor text optimization and strategic linking. 6. Add social media links to improve engagement and sharing. 7. Consider adding a blog or news section to improve content freshness and frequency. 8. Optimize page speed by compressing images, minifying CSS and JavaScript files, and leveraging browser caching. Note that this evaluation is based on a single HTML page and may not reflect the entire website's SEO performance. A more comprehensive SEO audit would require analyzing multiple pages, technical aspects, and external factors.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна