Анализ сайта sg53.ru
Основная информация
Заголовок (title): СнабГруз - продажа и поставка нерудных материалов в Великом Новгороде
Описание (description):
H1: Продажа нерудных материалов: щебень гранитный, гравийный, известняковый, вторичный, отсев гранитный, песок речной, торф и торфосмеси, асфальтовая крошка
Технические детали
Время загрузки: 4.07 секунд
Сервер: nginx/1.26.1
IP адрес: 188.225.40.227
Серверы имен: ['ns1.timeweb.ru.', 'ns2.timeweb.ru.', 'ns3.timeweb.org.', 'ns4.timeweb.org.']
Краткое описание
Сайт sg53.ru предлагает продажу и доставку нерудных материалов, таких как песок, щебень, керамзит, гравий, торф и другие, в Великом Новгороде и Новгородской области. Компания СнабГруз обеспечивает высокую степень надежности, пунктуальности и оперативности в своих услугах.
Ключевые слова
{'песок': 9, 'подробнее': 8, 'цены': 8, 'щебень': 8, 'руб': 7, 'смеси': 6, 'гранитный': 6, 'нерудных': 5, 'материалов': 5, 'керамзит': 5}
SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации
Here is the evaluation of the website sg53.ru from an SEO perspective, based on the provided HTML code: **1. Page Title**: 8/10 The page title is present and descriptive, but it's quite long and may be truncated in search engine results pages (SERPs). **2. Meta Description**: 0/10 The meta description is empty, which is a missed opportunity to provide a summary of the page's content and entice users to click through from search engine results. **3. Header Tags**: 6/10 The page uses H1, H2, and other header tags, but they are not consistently used throughout the page, and some sections lack header tags altogether. **4. Content Quality and Uniqueness**: 7/10 The content appears to be unique and relevant to the topic, but it's not particularly engaging or well-structured. **5. Keyword Usage**: 5/10 There are some keywords present in the content, but they are not strategically used throughout the page, and the keyword density is not optimized. **6. Image Optimization**: 3/10 Images are used on the page, but they lack alt tags, descriptive file names, and are not optimized for search engines. **7. Internal Linking**: 4/10 There are some internal links present, but they are not consistently used throughout the page, and some links are not descriptive. **8. Mobile-Friendliness**: 9/10 The page appears to be mobile-friendly, with a responsive design that adapts to different screen sizes. **9. Page Speed**: 6/10 The page speed is average, with some opportunities for improvement in terms of optimizing images and reducing HTTP requests. **10. Meta Tags**: 5/10 Some meta tags are present, such as the charset and viewport tags, but others, like the robots tag, are missing. **Recommendations for improvement:** 1. Write a compelling and descriptive meta description for each page. 2. Optimize header tags throughout the page, using a clear hierarchy (H1, H2, H3, etc.). 3. Improve content quality and structure, using shorter paragraphs and breaking up long blocks of text. 4. Conduct keyword research and strategically use target keywords throughout the page. 5. Optimize images by adding alt tags, descriptive file names, and compressing images to reduce file size. 6. Improve internal linking by using descriptive anchor text and linking to relevant, useful pages. 7. Consider adding a robots.txt file and optimizing meta tags for search engines. 8. Test and improve page speed by optimizing images, reducing HTTP requests, and leveraging browser caching. By addressing these areas, the website can improve its SEO performance and increase its visibility in search engine results.
DNS записи
WHOIS информация
Информация WHOIS недоступна