SEO-анализ сайта и рекомендации

Here is the evaluation of the website snezhmebel.ru from an SEO perspective, based on the provided HTML code:

**1. Meta Tags**

* Title tag: 8/10 (good, but could be more descriptive and concise)
* Meta description: 7/10 (good, but could be more compelling and concise)
* Keywords tag: 2/10 (not recommended, as it's not used by search engines)

**2. Header Tags**

* H1 tag: 8/10 (good, but could be more descriptive and concise)
* H2-H6 tags: 5/10 (some are used, but not consistently throughout the page)

**3. Content**

* Quality: 6/10 (good, but could be more engaging and informative)
* Quantity: 7/10 (good, but could be more comprehensive)
* Uniqueness: 8/10 (good, but could be more unique and not duplicated)

**4. Internal Linking**

* 5/10 (some internal links are present, but could be more organized and structured)

**5. Image Optimization**

* Alt tags: 6/10 (some images have alt tags, but not all)
* File names: 4/10 (file names are not descriptive and do not include target keywords)

**6. Mobile-Friendliness**

* 8/10 (the website is responsive, but could be more optimized for mobile devices)

**7. Page Speed**

* 5/10 (the website's loading speed is average, could be improved)

**8. Social Media Integration**

* 2/10 (no social media integration is present)

**9. Analytics and Tracking**

* 8/10 (some analytics tools are present, but could be more comprehensive)

**10. Code Quality**

* 6/10 (the code is mostly clean, but could be more optimized and minified)

Recommendations for improvement:

1. Optimize title tags and meta descriptions for each page.
2. Use header tags consistently throughout the page.
3. Improve content quality, quantity, and uniqueness.
4. Organize and structure internal linking.
5. Optimize image file names and alt tags.
6. Improve mobile-friendliness and page speed.
7. Integrate social media links and buttons.
8. Use more comprehensive analytics tools.
9. Optimize and minify code.
10. Consider using schema markup and other advanced SEO techniques.

Note: This evaluation is based on a single page of the website, and a more comprehensive evaluation would require analyzing the entire website and its structure.